Mazreku: Serbia's large military investments prompted the Kosovo, Albania, and Croatia agreement

Professor of European Law from Pristina, Avni Mazreku, believes that the declaration on strengthening defense cooperation between Albania, Kosovo, and Croatia is a result of global developments affecting the region, however, he also sees the agreement as a direct response to Serbia’s significant investments in its military.

Mazreku notes that he has not read the full text of the agreement but considers the military cooperation initiative intriguing, especially given that Croatia and Albania are NATO members, while Kosovo is not.

"Serbia has the strongest military power in the region. It is not threatened by neighboring countries and does not participate in any international military alliances. One could argue that Serbia does not need such large military investments, as it is not at risk from any neighboring state. There have been no signs of aggressive aspirations or military invasion tendencies. Military investments are typically made for defending external borders, while police forces serve other purposes, such as counterterrorism or handling internal disturbances. I believe that Serbia’s massive investments in the defense industry and military have served as an incentive for these three countries to reach such an agreement," Mazreku stated.

He says that Croatia’s military industry, especially in recent years, has become one of the most respected in terms of arms production, whereas Albania and Kosovo do not have a strong military industry.

"Croatia can supply Albania’s military needs as a NATO member, considering that it produces weapons that meet NATO standards. Kosovo could sign military agreements with other countries, both within and outside Europe, but such agreements might not be as suitable or high-quality, given the capabilities of Croatia’s military industry. Additionally, pricing is an important factor. That is why I see this triangular agreement as beneficial," Mazreku concluded.